Content deleted Content added
→Past Tense: new section |
|||
Line 171:
Why does this article refer to XPS/OXPS in the past tense? I have not found any mention in the article of the format's demise or abandonment, so the use of past tense is confusing. If past tense is applicable, I believe it is important to explain the rationale prominently in the first paragraph. Otherwise, I propose that this article be edited to use present tense. [[User:Wthrower|Wthrower]] ([[User talk:Wthrower|talk]]) 03:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
the intro is written at way to sophisticated a level for a general encylopedia
re write it so it is intelligelbe to you grandmother, somoething along the lines of a is a type of electroni file that is like a piece of paper, in that it is hard to change after it is made, unlike say a typical wordprocessor document which can be chagned at will
The XPS rules (specificatins) include rules for describebing the page, font, etc
(and if you carp about my poor speling you get an exgtra deduction for not seeing forest for the trees)
| |||