First-class constraint: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m replace mr template with mr parameter in CS1 templates; using AWB
repaired link(s) to disambiguation pages (you can help) - Bundle; added Further reading section
Line 78:
For most "practical" applications of first-class constraints, we do not see such complications: the [[Quotient space (topology)|quotient space]] of the restricted subspace by the f-flows (in other words, the orbit space) is well behaved enough to act as a [[differentiable manifold]], which can be turned into a [[symplectic manifold]] by projecting the [[symplectic form]] of M onto it (this can be shown to be [[well defined]]). In light of the observation about physical observables mentioned earlier, we can work with this more "physical" smaller symplectic manifold, but with 2n fewer dimensions.
 
In general, the quotient space is a bit "nasty" to work with when doing concrete calculations (not to mention nonlocal when working with [[diffeomorphism constraint]]s), so what is usually done instead is something similar. Note that the restricted submanifold is a [[Bundle (mathematics)|bundle]] (but not a [[fiber bundle]] in general) over the quotient manifold. So, instead of working with the quotient manifold, we can work with a [[Section (category theory)|section]] of the bundle instead. This is called [[gauge fixing]].
 
The ''major'' problem is this bundle might not have a [[global section]] in general. This is where the "problem" of [[global anomaly|global anomalies]] comes in, for example. See [[Gribov ambiguity]]. This is a flaw in quantizing [[gauge theory|gauge theories]] many physicists overlooked.
Line 251:
 
==See also==
 
*[[Dirac bracket]]
*[[Holonomic constraint]]
Line 258 ⟶ 257:
==References==
{{reflist}}
 
Also see
==Further reading==
* {{cite doi|10.1088/0143-0807/4/1/003|noedit}}
* {{cite doi| 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.2049|noedit}}