Revision as of 18:15, 23 December 2014 edit GeneCallahan (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 773 edits →Fundamental pattern category ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:16, 23 December 2014 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,805 edits m Dating comment by GeneCallahan - "→Fundamental pattern category: " Next edit →
Line 96: ::: Err, I guess I don't agree with [[User:dmyersturnbull\|dmyersturnbull]] (and apparently I can not read). Anyways, the reference above is worth looking at if you are pursuing this. There is literature where people try to dissect the ''universal'' nature of a pattern. As with the multiple language example above, an excess of things named patterns can dilute as well. [[User:Bpringlemeir\|Bpringlemeir]] ([[User talk:Bpringlemeir\|talk]]) 01:48, 16 July 2010 (UTC) ::: "Encapsulation and inheritance are general directions for structuring code..." In other words, patterns?! This looks like the very definition of a pattern! [[User:GeneCallahan\|GeneCallahan]] ([[User talk:GeneCallahan\|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned"> — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|undated]] comment added 18:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == Why is Factory not listed? ==

Talk:Software design pattern: Difference between revisions