Revision as of 14:26, 30 December 2014 edit Schily (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,524 edits →False claims about the original developer of ELF in the article ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:55, 30 December 2014 edit undo Dsimic (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 39,664 edits →False claims about the original developer of ELF in the article: Replied Next edit →
Line 115: ::::::: Yes, that's quite an issue, as many not-so-grandiose things back from those days simply haven't been covered well or at all. Unfortunately, I don't see how could we "turn" such things into what Wikipedia considers to be reliable sources. — [[User:Dsimic\|Dsimic]] ([[User talk:Dsimic#nobold\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Dsimic\|contribs]]) 22:36, 29 December 2014 (UTC) ::::::::It is probably hard to find a reliable source for the talk from Bill Joy on the Sun User Group meeting. This is however no reason to keep an unreliable source (corrently even without a hint about it's questionable content) and a derived statement about the initiator of the ELF format. A trustworthy encyclopedia cannot keep such questionable claims uncommented. [[User:Schily\|Schily]] ([[User talk:Schily\|talk]]) 14:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC) ::::::::: Any chances, please, for clarifying a bit why do you find the [http://refspecs.linuxbase.org/elf/elf.pdf#page=3 ELF specification] to be an unreliable source? — [[User:Dsimic\|Dsimic]] ([[User talk:Dsimic#nobold\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Dsimic\|contribs]]) 14:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Executable and Linkable Format: Difference between revisions