Content deleted Content added
→An alternative proof: explained why product of leading terms gives leading term of product |
|||
Line 99:
'''Lemma'''. The leading term of {{math|''e''<sub>''λ''<sup>t</sup></sub> (''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''n''</sub>)}} is {{math|''X''<sup>''λ''</sup>}}.
:''Proof''.
Now one proves by induction on the leading monomial in lexicographic order, that any nonzero homogeneous symmetric polynomial {{mvar|''P''}} of degree {{mvar|''d''}} can be written as polynomial in the elementary symmetric polynomials. Since {{mvar|''P''}} is symmetric, its leading monomial has weakly decreasing exponents, so it is some {{math|''X''<sup>''λ''</sup>}} with {{mvar|''λ''}} a partition of {{math|''d''}}. Let the coefficient of this term be {{mvar|''c''}}, then {{math|''P'' − ''ce''<sub>''λ''<sup>t</sup></sub> (''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''n''</sub>)}} is either zero or a symmetric polynomial with a strictly smaller leading monomial. Writing this difference inductively as a polynomial in the elementary symmetric polynomials, and adding back {{math|''ce''<sub>''λ''<sup>t</sup></sub> (''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''n''</sub>)}} to it, one obtains the sought for polynomial expression for {{math|''P''}}.
|