Content deleted Content added
→Too technical: new section |
|||
Line 36:
I hope it's OK that I added the "technical" template at the top of the article. The reason is that the article doesn't give an overview that's comprehensible to someone who isn't already quite familiar with the subject. The lead is fine, but the next paragraph assumes intimate familiarity with the subject. The article could really do with a first section that introduces the subject to someone who's familiar with the prerequisites (e.g. single-variable complex analysis, multivariable real calculus) but who hasn't studied multivariable calculus ''per se''. (Unfortunately I cannot write such a section, as I am a member of this target audience.) [[User:Nathanielvirgo|Nathaniel Virgo]] ([[User talk:Nathanielvirgo|talk]]) 13:05, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
:You need to be still more specific. The paragraph following the lead is in the history section. Such a section is not even intended to be understood mathematically (for those unfamiliar with the subject). The section after that is on {{math|ℂ<sup>''n''</sup>}}. Is it here you get stuck? [[User:YohanN7|YohanN7]] ([[User talk:YohanN7|talk]]) 16:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
| |||