|
[[File:Ashokpratapyadav.jpg|thumbnail|Ashok pratap yadav]]
{{Help intro frame top}}
'''[https://www.facebook.com/ashokpratapyadav Ashok pratap yadav]''' is the student of software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence at the Punjab Technical University.
<!-- TABS -->
{{Help:Introduction to referencing/tabs|This=4}}
|style="padding: 2em;" |
<!-- CONTENT -->
{{Shortcut|WP:INTREF4}}
Ashok is belong to phulwariya Gopalganj and- “he like the dreams of the future better than the history of the past.”
[[File:Question book-new.svg|left|100px]]
Now you know ''how'' to add sources to an article, but ''which'' sources should you use? Wikipedia articles require '''reliable, published sources''' that directly support the information presented in the article.
<big>PROFESSIONAL SKILLS</big> '''Computer programming'''
The word "source" in Wikipedia has three meanings: the work itself (for example, a document, article, paper, or book), the creator of the work (for example, the writer), and the publisher of the work (for example, Cambridge University Press). All three can affect reliability.
<big>EDUCATION</big>;
As a general rule, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing of a publication, the more reliable it is. Academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources. Other reliable sources include university textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and mainstream newspapers. (<small>Be aware that some news organisations and magazines, such as CNN's [[iReport]], host "blogs" and user-written articles on their websites. These may be reliable if they are written by the publisher's professional writers, but posts by readers are not usually considered reliable sources.</small>)
'''Co-Operative High School'''
2006 to 2009 (7th to 10th)· Gopalganj, India
'''Gopeshwar College'''
'''Self-published media''', where the author and publisher are the same, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs and tweets, are largely '''not''' acceptable as sources. However, if an author is an established expert with a previous record of third-party publications on a topic, their self-published work ''may'' be considered reliable for that topic, though third-party publications are still preferable.
2009 to 2011 · Chemistry · Physics · Mathematics · Hathua, India
I.SC (math)
'''Punjab Technical University'''
Whether a source is usable also depends on context. Bear in mind that sources that are reliable for some material are not reliable for other material. You should always try to find the best possible source for the information you have. For information about '''living people''', only the most reliable sources should be used. On the other hand, self-published sources can ''sometimes'' be used as sources of information about themselves.
2011 to 2014 · Software Engineering · Jalandhar, India
<big>contact info</big>
These are general guidelines, but the topic of reliable sources is a complicated one which it is impossible to fully cover here. You can find more information at [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] and at [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources]].
website: http://www.ashokpratapyadav.blogspot.in/
{{Help intro next| target = Help:Introduction to referencing/5}}
google+ : https://plus.google.com/+Ashokpratapyadav143
|}
facebook : https://www.facebook.com/ashokpratapyadav
[[Category:Wikipedia quick introductions]]
| 