Content deleted Content added
Help needed: Winkler |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5:
In recent decades, the [[dual reciprocity method]] (DRM)<ref>Partridge PW, Brebbia CA, Wrobel LC, The dual reciprocity boundary element method. Computational Mechanics Publications, 1992</ref> and [[multiple reciprocity method]] (MRM)<ref>Nowak AJ, Neves AC, The multiple reciprocity boundary element method. Computational Mechanics Publication, 1994</ref> have been emerging as promising techniques to evaluate the particular solution of nonhomogeneous [[partial differential equations]] in conjunction with the boundary discretization techniques, such as [[boundary element method]] (BEM). For instance, the so-called DR-BEM and MR-BEM are popular BEM techniques in the numerical solution of nonhomogeneous problems.
The DRM has become a common method to evaluate the particular solution. However, the DRM requires inner nodes to guarantee the convergence and stability.
The recursive composite multiple reciprocity method (RC-MRM),<ref name="Chena">Chen W, Meshfree boundary particle method applied to Helmholtz problems. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 2002,26(7): 577–581</ref><ref name="Chenb">Chen W, Fu ZJ, Jin BT, A truly boundary-only meshfree method for inhomogeneous problems based on recursive composite multiple reciprocity technique. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 2010,34(3): 196–205</ref> was proposed to overcome the above-mentioned problems. The key idea of the RC-MRM is to employ high-order composite differential operators instead of high-order Laplacian operators to eliminate a number of nonhomogeneous terms in the governing equation. The RC-MRM uses the recursive structures of the MRM interpolation matrix to reduce computational costs.
|