Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReactJS: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→ReactJS: keep |
||
Line 17:
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|96%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br />'''Comment''': Policy-backed rationales, please<br/>
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em "Avenir";color:#909'>czar</span> [[user:czar|<span style="color:black;font-size:1.2em"><u>⨹</u></span>]] 23:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|ReactJS]]</div>
* '''Keep'''. I found coverage in a few places: [http://phpmagazin.de/artikel/react-javascript-frameworks-177281 this article] in [[:de:PHP Magazin]], [http://www.infoworld.com/article/2608181/javascript/react--making-faster--smoother-uis-for-data-driven-web-apps.html this already cited article] in [[InfoWorld]], and [http://labs.ft.com/2013/10/client-side-layout-engines-react-vs-fruitmachine/ this article-type thing] at the [[Financial Times]] (not sure this has editorial oversight, but it seems to be part of the FT). There's also a few trivial mentions which don't help notability all that much but can possibly be used for citations, for what it's worth: [http://www.pcworld.com/article/2849532/facebooks-flow-could-help-javascript-programmers-spot-elusive-bugs.html], [http://www.zdnet.com/article/facebooks-open-source-library-has-grown-to-9-9m-lines-of-code/], [http://venturebeat.com/2013/12/10/how-facebook-could-save-the-mobile-web-starting-with-open-sourcing-its-secret-tools/], [http://venturebeat.com/2013/12/20/here-are-facebooks-9-top-open-source-projects-from-2013/]. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 03:58, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
| |||