Revision as of 15:42, 22 January 2015 edit 68.45.155.10 (talk) →Possible NSA backdoor ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:44, 22 January 2015 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,930 edits m Signing comment by 68.45.155.10 - "→Possible NSA backdoor: " Next edit →
Line 183: :::::You should clearly read the text a little more closely. The fact that quotable sources are making comments about the possible untrustworthiness of the NSA-recommended elliptic curves, and hence on their use in ECC, is relevant in the section. —[[User_talk:Quondum\|''Quondum'']] 18:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC) Just have to agree with people saying it should be mentioned if only to disambiguate the issue from this page. I too expected to see something about it and had to read the talk page to understand that not all ECC was compromised. Only a very small number of potential readers here know enough to make the distinction required; the vast majority simply think ECC->NSA->backdoored. It's just the reality of the situation. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.45.155.10\|68.45.155.10]] ([[User talk:68.45.155.10\|talk]]) 15:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == Group Order ==

Talk:Elliptic-curve cryptography: Difference between revisions