Revision as of 12:23, 23 January 2015 edit Computerfaner (talk \| contribs) 37 edits →What kinda release of Windows Server 2003 distribute .net framework 2.0?: I wish this is a conclusion about this section. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:56, 23 January 2015 edit undo Ponyo (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators 181,923 edits rm commentary posted by sock Next edit →
Line 35: :I removed what I posted here because of your behaviours, and I got a warning about being blocked here! That is for what? I think you, Codename List, had better show respect to yourself before anything. You could do anything to my account without needing telling me again and again. I don't want to have any biz with you, Codename Lisa! [[User:Janagewen\|Janagewen]] ([[User talk:Janagewen\|talk]]) 01:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC) Please do not argue or quarrel, there is nothing serious. Please find an evaluation disc of Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2003 R2 to have a try on VMware, Hyper-V, or VirtualBox. At least on my trying, there is no .net framework 2.0 on Windows Server 2003, but on Windows Server 2003 R2 Disc 2. I've no ideas why that website described it like that. But nothing serious! [[User:Computerfaner\|Computerfaner]] ([[User talk:Computerfaner\|talk]]) 12:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC) == What Does "DISTRIBUTED" Really Mean in This Template? ==

Template talk:.NET Framework version history: Difference between revisions