Content deleted Content added
→History: Replied |
→History: reply |
||
Line 230:
::: Well, the article is very well written but quite wordy in some sections; perhaps the people who wrote it used some references but missed to note them in the article. I'll do the above described compaction later today, it should be rather good. At the same time, cleanups you've performed are just fine and according to [[MOS:COMPNOW]]. — [[User:Dsimic|Dsimic]] ([[User talk:Dsimic#nobold|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Dsimic|contribs]]) 19:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
::::{{reply to | Dsimic}} Oh cool, [[MOS:COMPNOW]] will help with the essay I'm writing about tense. Maybe it would be worth scanning the article's history or using wikiblame, and contacting the major contributors who are already familiar with the sources and can cite them. It seems like somebody probably wrote well-formatted and well-thought-out prose like this in educated swaths. Or, that's wishful thinking. — [[User:Smuckola|Smuckola]] <small>[[Special:EmailUser/Smuckola|(Email)]] [[User talk:Smuckola|(Talk)]]</small> 00:57, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
| |||