Revision as of 02:51, 24 January 2015 edit Smuckola (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 32,228 edits →History: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:47, 24 January 2015 edit undo Dsimic (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 39,664 edits →History: Replied Next edit →
Line 240: ::::::{{reply to \| Dsimic}} You're wanting to disregard the existing RS references already given for the text already written, in favor of homework and lecture notes? Wat. No. — [[User:Smuckola\|Smuckola]] <small>[[Special:EmailUser/Smuckola\|(Email)]] [[User talk:Smuckola\|(Talk)]]</small> 02:51, 24 January 2015 (UTC) ::::::: Of course not, those three references above would be only ''added'' to back what we already have as the article content. There are no reasons to discard anything that's already part of the article. — [[User:Dsimic\|Dsimic]] ([[User talk:Dsimic#nobold\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Dsimic\|contribs]]) 16:47, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Microcode: Difference between revisions