Institutional analysis and development framework: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:29, 1 February 2015

Revision as of 23:49, 1 February 2015

Line 5:

{{technical|date=January 2015}}

}}

'''The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework''' (IAD framework) was originally developed{{when|date=February 2015}} to help unpicking the complexities of institutions and institutional configurations. The IAD views institutions as set of rules, which determine the proceeding of reoccurring actions.<ref>{{cite web|author1=Charlotte Hess|author2=Elinor Ostrom|title=Ideas, Artifacts, and Facilities: Information as a Common-Pool Resource|url=http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1276&context=lcp|publisher=Duke University School of Law|accessdate=30 January 2015|page=22}}</ref>

[[Elinor Ostrom]], an American political economist have described the IAD as a "multi-level conceptual map" with which one could zoom in and out of particular hierarchical parts of the regularised interactions in an established social system. It assumes a context to the particular interaction in which the general network of regular actors would be analysed, the particular rules-in-use, and the particular common outcome that they hope to achieve. In the traditional analysis of [[Common-pool_resource|common pool arrangements]], the common outcome would be a particular resource which the actors draw on.<ref name="Understanding Institutional Diversity">{{cite book|author=Elinor Ostrom|title=Understanding Institutional Diversity|date=2009|publisher=Princeton University Press|___location=Princeton|isbn=9781400831739|url=http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s8085.pdf|accessdate=30 January 2015}}</ref>