Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Signing comment by 131.111.176.16 - "" |
||
Line 1:
"As SNPs are highly conserved throughout evolution and within a population..."- an incorrect sentence. SNPs are not highly conserved, most SNPs fall outside coding sequences and outside regulatory regions, most SNPs are in nonfunctional DNA and evolving neutrally, only a small minority of SNPs are under selection. Also it makes little sense to say "SNPs are highly conserved throughout evolution" because SNPs are by definition intra-species variation (that's what a polymorphism is). If a SNP was "highly conserved" then it would be the same nucleotide in every individual of a species and across multiple species, but then it would no longer be classified as a SNP as it would be fixed in the population/species. The 2nd half of the sentence, "the map of SNPs serves as an excellent genotypic marker for research", has no clear meaning. I suggest the whole sentence is removed.
-End of rant- <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/131.111.176.16|131.111.176.16]] ([[User talk:131.111.176.16|talk]]) 10:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
=Probes <-> Targets=
| |||