Revision as of 23:27, 10 November 2013 edit Bryanrutherford0 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 31,389 edits Adding class & importance to statistics rating template ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:53, 16 February 2015 edit undo Neurociencia colombia (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,530 edits →Disadvantage of Likelihood ratios: new section Next edit →
Line 47: ==Footnotes added== I added more footnotes from a reference, as requested by the tag [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pre-_and_post-test_probability&action=historysubmit&diff=446947036&oldid=446946032]. The article surely needs more referenced entries, but I don't think it lacks specifically in in-line citations of existing references. [[User:Mikael Häggström\|Mikael Häggström]] ([[User talk:Mikael Häggström\|talk]]) 09:09, 27 August 2011 (UTC) == Disadvantage of Likelihood ratios == I deleted the disadvantage of LR because it is possible to do a calculation of likelihood ratios for tests with continuous values or more than two outcomes which is similar to the calculation for dichotomous outcomes; a separate likelihood ratio is simply calculated for every level of test result and is called interval or stratum specific likelihood ratios.<ref>{{cite journal \| doi = 10.1067/mem.2003.274 \| author = Brown MD, Reeves MJ. \| year = 2003 \| title = Evidence-based emergency medicine/skills for evidence-based emergency care. Interval likelihood ratios: another advantage for the evidence-based diagnostician \| url = \| journal =Ann Emerg Med \| volume = 42 \| issue = 2\| pages = 292-297 \| pmid = 12883521 }}</ref>

Talk:Pre- and post-test probability: Difference between revisions