Revision as of 10:54, 16 February 2015 edit Neurociencia colombia (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,530 edits m →Disadvantage of Likelihood ratios ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:56, 16 February 2015 edit undo Neurociencia colombia (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,530 edits m →Disadvantage of Likelihood ratios Next edit →
Line 50: == Disadvantage of Likelihood ratios == I deleted the disadvantage of LR in the table because it is possible to do a calculation of likelihood ratios for tests with continuous values or more than two outcomes which is similar to the calculation for dichotomous outcomes; a separate likelihood ratio is simply calculated for every level of test result and is called interval or stratum specific likelihood ratios.<ref>{{cite journal \| doi = 10.1067/mem.2003.274 \| author = Brown MD, Reeves MJ. \| year = 2003 \| title = Evidence-based emergency medicine/skills for evidence-based emergency care. Interval likelihood ratios: another advantage for the evidence-based diagnostician \| url = \| journal =Ann Emerg Med \| volume = 42 \| issue = 2\| pages = 292-297 \| pmid = 12883521 }}</ref> [[User:Gcastellanos\|Gcastellanos]] ([[User talk:Gcastellanos\|talk]]) 10:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Pre- and post-test probability: Difference between revisions