Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afnix (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:52, 21 February 2011

Revision as of 00:37, 19 February 2015

Line 31:

:::::::*'''Comment''' &ndash; Feel free to argue this with the nominator. The purpose of this discussion is the notability of the article. Once more I have not found any Ghits or GNEWs of substance to support any claims of notability. I look forward to your improvements to the article. My best to you. [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 05:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' &ndash; As I am the original author, I have started to enhance the Afnix article, which surely needed improvement. Afnix is not an obscure language. It has been around for 10 years and has served for numerous experiments when it comes to combine advanced functional language with the object oriented paradigm. Afnix is also part of the FreeBSD port collection. It would be unfortunate to see the article deleted. {{<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Amauryd|Amauryd}}]] ([[User talk:Amauryd|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Amauryd|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

:*'''Comment''' &ndash; The article is not nominated for deletion based on obscurity, but rather because it lacks Ghits and GNEWs of substance and the article provides no independent reliable sources to support claims of [[WP:N|notability]]. All articles in Wikipedia must be [[WP:V| verifiable]] using [[WP:RS]]. [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 01:37, 19 February 2011 (UTC)