Content deleted Content added
Line 67:
*Not Encyclopedic
Admittedly, Britannica probably would not have this article. Britannica is also not as good as wikipedia. This article is a compendium recommending a lot of good information. People need to get things done with computers, C/Java/Python/C++/C#/Haskell are all ways to get stuff done, how do they compare? Many people have found this article useful. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Evolvedmicrobe|Evolvedmicrobe]] ([[User talk:Evolvedmicrobe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Evolvedmicrobe|contribs]]) 21:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Agree, the article is '''definitely useful and valuable''', for programmers and practitioners from both camps who are interested at the differences and connections between the two popular languages. Keep and improve it. -- [[User:Softzen|Softzen]] ([[User talk:Softzen|talk]]) 02:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
:Err... Java is an open standard. [[Special:Contributions/68.173.113.106|68.173.113.106]] ([[User talk:68.173.113.106|talk]]) 21:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC) (woops, sorry! I thought it was but the oracle google lawsuit made me wonder.
|