Paderborn method: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:44, 11 September 2014

Revision as of 14:55, 2 March 2015

Line 79:

==Hypotheses==

{{see also|Psychopedagogy|Esperanto grammar}}

There could be many reasons why this method works, notice also that in the following only Esperanto is mentioned, because this method uses it Esperanto, but it is likely that another very easy [[planned language]] with similar features could be employed instead.

#Esperanto is extremely regular<ref>example, to make the plural form of a word the ending -j is used, and this rule has no exceptions as, example, the English tooth-teeth, the Italian ''ginocchio-ginocchia''</ref> and transparent.<ref>verbs, adverbs, nouns, adjectives are marked by a particular ending</ref> I. e. all adjectives finish by -a and all nouns finish by -o. So the difference between those two parts of speech are passively learned by the student; when he will learn another language, will be easier to explain him what is an adjective and what is a noun. In addition, Esperanto is an [[agglutinative language]], and this involves the student in active use of the lexicon.