Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shen (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate |
|||
Line 4:
{{notavote|https://groups.google.com/d/msg/qilang/BH711MXPBjY/7n-EWb4jBa0J}}
:{{la|Shen (programming language)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shen (programming language)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015
:({{Find sources AFD|Shen (programming language)}})
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by [[WP:GNG]]. Every single source offered is [[WP:PRIMARY]] and thus unsuitable. Googling turned up nothing useful. This article has been tagged for COI, notability and primary sources for almost 3 years. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 10:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Line 38:
:::You're right. They're not articles. More specifically, they're not what we consider [[WP:RS]] reliable sources. You really need to get something ''published'' in a journal or a magazine or something, not just presented somewhere. Techie magazines are always looking for material. Propose some articles to them. I suggested this in the 2nd Qi AfD three years ago and I'm a little surprised this seems so difficult. Otoh, if it really is that difficult, I think you have your answer as to why I question whether this is a notable subject. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 02:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Nakon|<font color="#C50">'''Nakon'''</font>]] 05:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Shen (programming language)]]</div>
| |||