Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shen (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
tagging canvassed and spa, added comment |
No edit summary |
||
Line 38:
:::You're right. They're not articles. More specifically, they're not what we consider [[WP:RS]] reliable sources. You really need to get something ''published'' in a journal or a magazine or something, not just presented somewhere. Techie magazines are always looking for material. Propose some articles to them. I suggested this in the 2nd Qi AfD three years ago and I'm a little surprised this seems so difficult. Otoh, if it really is that difficult, I think you have your answer as to why I question whether this is a notable subject. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 02:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
:::::: From [[WP:RS]] it seems that video is fine as a published source "However, audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable sources." The question then becomes if Strange Loop and InfoQ are considered reliable sources.[[User:Yofsotsi|Yofsotsi]] ([[User talk:Yofsotsi|talk]]) 03:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Nakon|<font color="#C50">'''Nakon'''</font>]] 05:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Shen (programming language)]]</div>
I should introduce myself; I am Dr Willi Riha, formerly lecturer in comparative programming languages at
|