Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shen (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:44, 9 March 2015

Revision as of 10:21, 9 March 2015

Line 40:

:::::: From [[WP:RS]] it seems that video is fine as a published source "However, audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable sources." The question then becomes if Strange Loop and InfoQ are considered reliable sources.[[User:Yofsotsi|Yofsotsi]] ([[User talk:Yofsotsi|talk]]) 03:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

::::::: I think developer conferences like Strange Loop and InfoQ accept talk based purely on a submitted abstract, or by invitation based on past performance of the speaker. As such the have little to no control over the content and thus wouldn't rank as particularly reliable due to lack of any review. For establishing notability it's a start, but one or two conferences in total still doesn't meet the criteria (I'm pretty sure we don't have an article on the vast majority of topic discussed in one talk at a developer's conference.) —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 10:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br />