Revision as of 22:03, 11 March 2015 edit Msnicki (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,360 edits →Shen (programming language): no, we do not accept WP:Self-published sources ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:11, 11 March 2015 edit undo Msnicki (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,360 edits →Shen (programming language): tagging spa Next edit →
Line 103: Do these count [[User:Tiodante\|Tiodante]] ([[User talk:Tiodante\|talk]]) 21:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC) <small>— [[User:Tiodante\|Tiodante]] ([[User talk:Tiodante\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tiodante\|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account\|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small> ::No, sorry, they do not. Those all appear to be [[WP:Self-published sources]]. Anybody can claim to be an expert and publish anything on his own. This is why we ask for [[WP:Reliable sources]], defined as those with reputations for fact-checking and editorial control, and do not accept blogs, YouTube videos and so on. But any reliable source will do. It could be a hobbyist magazine as long it's reliable and you can somehow get your material published there. It doesn't have to be [[Communications of the ACM]]. [[User:Msnicki\|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki\|talk]]) 22:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shen (programming language): Difference between revisions