Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Crisspy: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:23, 22 July 2006

Revision as of 16:25, 22 July 2006

Line 8:

<!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered Wikipedians may vote. Nominees should not vote for themselves. See [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship]] for more.-->

;Support

# '''Support''' I think that Crisspy would make a good admin. Wikipedia is '''way''' too bureaucratic and Crisspy would stop that.[[User:'sed|&#39;sed]] 16:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

too bureaucratic and Crisspy would stop that.[[User:'sed|&#39;sed]] 16:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

# '''Support''' I'd vote for Crisspy b/c he does 3 strikes instead of 1 strike.[[User:The mann hu new 2 much|The mann hu new 2 much]] 01:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

# ''' Strongest Possible Support''' I think Crisspy is incredibly eligible for admin. He did not realize that no campaigning is allowed, so that would explain the links that the opposing parties show. He gave strong answers to all of the questions, using the three-strike method for promising justice. He has dedicated a lot of his effort, work and time to wikipedia, and that's what makes a terrific, respectable admin. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Armando341|Armando341]] ([[User talk:Armando341|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Armando341|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small>

Line 19 ⟶ 16:

#'''Strongest Possible Oppose''' - not listed properly on the main RFA page, weak answer to question 1, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Keithgreer&curid=2101852&diff=65161165&oldid=64118571 spamming user talk pages] with this RFA, general inexperience (only 267 mainspace edits, oldest one at 31 March 2006), odd three-strike proposal which demonstrates lack of basic understanding of existing warning policies and practices. ([[User:ESkog|ESkog]])^{([[User talk:ESkog|Talk]])} 05:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''', [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship&diff=65225155&oldid=65188943 Malformed] nomination. [[User:Naconkantari|<font color="red">Nacon</font><font color="gray">'''kantari'''</font>]] 16:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' inexperience as demonstrated by malformed nom. --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]^{(<font color="mediumseagreen">[[User_talk:Pgk|talk]]</font>)} 16:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

;Neutral