Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Crisspy: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
oppose vote |
|||
Line 13:
# ''' Strongest Possible Support''' I think Crisspy is incredibly eligible for admin. He did not realize that no campaigning is allowed, so that would explain the links that the opposing parties show. He gave strong answers to all of the questions, using the three-strike method for promising justice. He has dedicated a lot of his effort, work and time to wikipedia, and that's what makes a terrific, respectable admin. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Armando341|Armando341]] ([[User talk:Armando341|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Armando341|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small>
# '''Strong Support''' I have done some research, and Crisspy is just what we need for an admin: hardworking, respectful, dedicated, and intelligent. He will make sure that wikipedia stays in great condition, and he will deal with rulebreakers with justice and fairness. [[user:Mark ritzchkin|Mark ritzchkin]]
#* Note editor has < 50 edits and this is first edit in a month. --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">[[User_talk:Pgk|talk]]</font>)</sup> 16:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
;Oppose
| |||