Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2015 CUOS appointments: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Some stats: Community % support by candidate: cmnt and Q |
|||
Line 78:
*'''Question''': Does anyone have any idea why the CU votes seem to reach the net 25, while the OS votes seem harder to come by? — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;"> ? </font>]]</span></small> 17:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. For me personally, I only supported those who I knew something about. My "lack" of a "vote" simply means that I don't have an impression or choice one way or another (usually because I'm not all that familiar with the candidate). Would that have the same end result as a "neutral"? (so I know for future elections). — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;"> ? </font>]]</span></small> 17:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
| |||