Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2015 CUOS appointments: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:39, 22 March 2015

Revision as of 03:37, 23 March 2015

Line 29:

== Some stats: Community % support by candidate ==

{| class="wikitable sortable"

|+ CUOS: % community support

Line 88 ⟶ 86:

All candidates who received no oppose votes, independent of the actual (low) number of votes cast, should be appointed without hesitation. [[User:Kraxler|Kraxler]] ([[User talk:Kraxler|talk]]) 13:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

:All comments about all candidates will be read and evaluated by each individual arbitrator, regardless of whether there have been any explicitly opposing them or not. All successful candidates will be appointed at the same time, regardless of their level of support. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 14:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

::Does this go by votes or consensus, what is the criteria for passing? [[User:VegasCasinoKid|VegasCasinoKid]] ([[User talk:VegasCasinoKid|talk]]) 03:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC)