Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Raph Levien (talk | contribs) Add vote for keep. |
|||
Line 81:
::::If you're going to make a remark like that, you really should have something to back it up. For the record, I do not have a conflict of interest re: this subject. Period. (If the closing admin feels it necessary, he or she is welcome to contact me via email and I will privately disclose my identity and my CV. There is nothing there.) [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 05:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. I have no horse in this game, other than being having a long-standing interest in programming languages, major and minor. Nim is definitely in the latter category. When I come across something like a minor programming language, I want to come to Wikipedia to learn more about it. Finding that the page has been deleted feels like bureaucracy and perhaps deletionism gone amok. There is clearly enough of a user community that Nim counts as a real programming language rather than just a toy. The article could definitely stand to be improved, but even now it's a lot better than no article. [[User:Raph Levien|Raph Levien]] ([[User talk:Raph Levien|talk]]) 06:27, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
| |||