Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Picky (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:41, 31 March 2015

Revision as of 19:14, 31 March 2015

Line 1:

== Article considered for deletion ==

I am sincerely surprised and alarmed by the nomination for deletion of a young, non-profit, free (as in beer and as in freedom) software project for '''education'''... just because it's not popular yet (i.e. notable).

What is the problem with the article?

First of all, this is not self-promotion. We work for a public institution and we are not selling anything. Picky is a free software project made for our students. '''400+ students/year''' use this language to learn the basic principles of programming.

Why should it be deleted?

Note that the language is very young and it's still on development (that is, it's not a dead project). This year, we developed a new compiler written in Go (the Google language). In addition, we included a new graphics library. The tools (compiler, runtime) are completely functional for Linux, OSX, Windows and Plan 9 from Bell Labs. Very few others can claim the same.

What can I do to fix it?

An academic paper is currently under review to be published in a CS education journal. Moreover, several institutions (from Spain and UK) have shown interest in the language, but it's too soon to expect them to adopt it (obviously).

Note that this is my first wikipedia talk, I do not know how to proceed.

Please consider the deletion. Picky is an alternative to classic languages and it would be interesting for other CS101 teachers.

[[User:Enrique.soriano|Enrique.soriano]] ([[User talk:Enrique.soriano|talk]]) 16:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

[[User:Enrique.soriano|Enrique.soriano]] ([[User talk:Enrique.soriano|talk]]) 1619:4113, 31 March 2015 (UTC)