Revision as of 11:26, 1 April 2015 edit Delirium (talk \| contribs) Administrators 51,655 edits weak keep ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:26, 1 April 2015 edit undo Delirium (talk \| contribs) Administrators 51,655 edits m format Next edit →
Line 108: ::That's maybe my opinion but I'm certain that after the language is 1.0, which probably will happen soon, the language will be cited and discussed everywhere and the article will be revived again, which would be somewhat silly because it was removed so many times because reasons. ::Nim is a well designed programming language. There are projects written in it. There's a community around the language. I personally like the language a lot and use it. But somehow Wikipedians think it's not worthy of Wikipedia. I don't understand this at all. It doesn't look unbiased. [[Special:Contributions/93.88.130.208\|93.88.130.208]] ([[User talk:93.88.130.208\|talk]]) 12:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC) :*'''Weak Keep'''. I think the article is probably notable enough, but I am also worried about the lack of good sources. I would support keeping, but being fairly careful with what goes in the article, so it doesn't end up as a mess of random opinions and claims "sourced" to e.g. Slashdot comments. A short stub article seems harmless though, and given that it seems to get some search traffic, probably useful to some readers. --[[User:Delirium\|Delirium]] ([[User talk:Delirium\|talk]]) 11:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language): Difference between revisions