Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m format |
Request Nim be deleted. |
||
Line 109:
::Nim is a well designed programming language. There are projects written in it. There's a community around the language. I personally like the language a lot and use it. But somehow Wikipedians think it's not worthy of Wikipedia. I don't understand this at all. It doesn't look unbiased. [[Special:Contributions/93.88.130.208|93.88.130.208]] ([[User talk:93.88.130.208|talk]]) 12:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
*'''Weak Keep'''. I think the article is probably notable enough, but I am also worried about the lack of good sources. I would support keeping, but being fairly careful with what goes in the article, so it doesn't end up as a mess of random opinions and claims "sourced" to e.g. Slashdot comments. A short stub article seems harmless though, and given that it seems to get some search traffic, probably useful to some readers. --[[User:Delirium|Delirium]] ([[User talk:Delirium|talk]]) 11:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. I have a canker sore on my lip and I keep poking at it with my tongue, but that's only making it worse! [[Special:Contributions/67.160.142.138|67.160.142.138]] ([[User talk:67.160.142.138|talk]]) 11:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
| |||