Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Be..anyone (talk | contribs) former requested article |
Be..anyone (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 131:
:::::::{{Reply to|Padenton}} Sorry my IP is changed. I should probably register. I just want to make something clear first. I'm a random programmer from Russia and English isn't my first language. I did not contribute anything to Nim. I do not have any agenda. However I invested a month of my life into coding in Nim at my job, which is an animation studio. I was very impressed with Nim and especially its macros and compile time code execution. There aren't that many languages that can do this. Nim's metaprogramming capabilities are extremely noteworthy, and people really do find it fascinating https://duckduckgo.com/?q=nimrod+metaprogramming I personally find the language very interesting and I don't understand why an encyclopedia shouldn't have an article about the language. Nim's compiler itself is actually very notable: it's a large project, it's written in Nim, and there aren't many other languages that can match its features. Removal of this article would make Wikipedia worse and nothing else. [[Special:Contributions/46.72.203.44|46.72.203.44]] ([[User talk:46.72.203.44|talk]]) 21:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
::::::::Please note that as [[:File:Wikipede_books.png|''wikipedes'']], we're kind of slow moving. The wannabe elitist nature of our site, and our concomitant efforts to preserve our pedestal in the public eye, together prevent us from diluting our content to what is substantiated by mere forks of [[Fork (software development)|forks]]. As a programmer, surely you understand - some [[pull request]]s must essentially be declined, and so must this article. We are driven by what we call [[WP:POLICY]] - this is enforced mercilessly by the [[WP:POLICE]]. Perhaps the future will bring A New Hope, but until then, the Wiki Empire and its Deletion System, with the capability to destroy an entire article, shall prevail. --[[User:IO Device|IO Device]] ([[User talk:IO Device|talk]]) 22:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
| |||