Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Be..anyone (talk | contribs) →Nim (programming language): keep (updating my comment) |
Relisting debate |
||
Line 4:
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimrod (programming language)}}</ul></div>
:{{la|Nim (programming language)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015
:({{Find sources AFD|programming language|(Nim OR Nimrod)}})
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by [[WP:GNG]]. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Nimrod+%28programming+language%29&year=&month=-1&tagfilter= deletion log for this article] shows that it has deleted twice at AfD in 2010 and 2013 and recreated and speedy deleted twice in 2013 and 2014 under the previous title, [[Nimrod (programming language)]]. This version was declined as [[Draft:Nim (programming language)]] in 2014. Speedy deletion was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nim_(programming_language)&diff=prev&oldid=653537277 declined this time] based on new sources not present previously. I'm not sure which sources are new since I don't have access to the old version and it was never snapshotted at archive.org but all of the sources currently offered are [[WP:PRIMARY]], [[WP:UNRELIABLE]] blogs or otherwise unsuitable. The only reliable source offered, a [http://www.drdobbs.com/jvm/the-rise-and-fall-of-languages-in-2013/240165192 Dr. Dobbs article], only makes a trivial mention of the subject. Google searches for Nim and Nimrod turned up nothing helpful. Recommending [[WP:SALT]]. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 01:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Line 132:
::::::::Please note that as [[:File:Wikipede_books.png|''wikipedes'']], we're kind of slow moving. The wannabe elitist nature of our site, and our concomitant efforts to preserve our pedestal in the public eye, together prevent us from diluting our content to what is substantiated by mere forks of [[Fork (software development)|forks]]. As a programmer, surely you understand - some [[pull request]]s must essentially be declined, and so must this article. We are driven by what we call [[WP:POLICY]] - this is enforced mercilessly by the [[WP:POLICE]]. Perhaps the future will bring A New Hope, but until then, the Wiki Empire and its Deletion System, with the capability to destroy an entire article, shall prevail. --[[User:IO Device|IO Device]] ([[User talk:IO Device|talk]]) 22:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
*<ins>'''Keep'''</ins><del>Comment</del>, that was a now existing [[Special:Diff/648590837|requested]] article. –[[User:Be..anyone|Be..anyone]] ([[User talk:Be..anyone|talk]]) 01:51, 2 April 2015 (UTC) <small>(updated to '''keep''' based on {{tlx|openhub|nimrod|nimrod}}. –[[User:Be..anyone|Be..anyone]] ([[User talk:Be..anyone|talk]]) 02:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC))</small>
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— [[User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<font color="#009900">have a cup</font>]] // [[Special:Contributions/Coffee|<font color="#4682b4">beans</font>]] // </small> 02:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Nim (programming language)]]</div>
| |||