Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m WP:DUMMYEDIT: So be it. |
weak keep WASTOOSOON |
||
Line 142:
:::It means we might consider an [[WP:SPS]] reliable for certain things. For example, we might accept an [[WP:SPS]] acceptable to establishing certain facts about the subject, e.g., that Nim supports term rewriting macros and that they do whatever they do. It does not mean we accept that because an expert wrote about the subject in his blog that that makes the subject notable. Reliable for establishing facts is not the same as reliable for establishing notability. And the reason is that essence of notability here on WP is not that anyone ''should'' take note of the subject, it's that ''they did'' and that they did it in reliable sources with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial control. A blog is never that. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 07:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
*'''Weak Keep''' borderline GNG, so a case of WASTOOSOON, falling back on IAR. (came here independently) <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 15:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
| |||