Content deleted Content added
Line 15:
This page should not be speedily deleted because I've been writing Nimrod code for five years, I've seen this article deleted two or three times (for reason of not having enough references) while pages for languages with '''no references''' persist, unthreatened: [[Ooc|ooc]], [[WLanguage]], [[Nemo_(programming_language)]]. Now if references define notability, surely those pages should be deleted and Nim should be left alone. --[[Special:Contributions/99.117.5.224|99.117.5.224]] ([[User talk:99.117.5.224|talk]]) 23:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
:The fact that other pages hadn't been noticed for deletion isn't evidence that this article is notable. You could, however, use a previous AfD decision as precedent. At the moment, two of the pages you've listed are now up for deletion and one has three different improvement needed widgets. [[User:Dhasenan|Dhasenan]] ([[User talk:Dhasenan|talk]]) 20:53, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
== Contested deletion ==
| |||