Revision as of 14:40, 4 April 2015 edit Padenton (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 5,225 edits →Nim (programming language) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:52, 4 April 2015 edit undo Widefox (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 110,643 edits yes, IAR is the policy Next edit →
Line 151: *'''Comment''' We have a couple of essays and a failed guideline that help (somewhat): [[WP:NSOFT]] and [[WP:99BOTTLES]], [[Wikipedia:Software notability]] . This passes 99BOTTLES [http://www.99-bottles-of-beer.net/language-nimrod-2245.html] <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox\|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox\|talk]]</span> 09:29, 4 April 2015 (UTC) {{Reply to\|Widefox}} 99bottles is an essay on non-notability, it doesn't grant notability. The 99 bottles site allows anyone to contribute to it. I can write a new language tomorrow and submit a 99bottles to the site the next day. Furthermore, this is what, the 5th time 99BOTTLES has been used in any discussion? ―<span style="background:#8FF;border:solid 1px;border-radius:8px;box-shadow:darkgray 2px 2px 2px"> [[User:Padenton\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;color:#C00">Padenton</span>]]\|[[User talk:Padenton\|✉]] </span>  14:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC) ::{{Reply to\|Padenton}} Yes, I said it's an essay. [[WP:IAR]] is the policy "that all editors should normally follow". I believe pertinent here, others may agree or not. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox\|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox\|talk]]</span> 14:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language): Difference between revisions