Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plaid (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
keep or merge |
Be..anyone (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9:
*'''Comment''' This "Typestate-Oriented Programming" rings a bell. While the language itself may not be notable enough for a separate article it could be merged as part of an article on [[Typestate-oriented programming]] or [[typestate analysis]]. I'd have to look further into this. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 11:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
*'''Keep, or worst case merge''': There are easy to find references to the language at Carnegie-Mellon, MIT, and Berkeley. There has been 2011 published material since the 2009 article mentioned. I think this is obviously both a legitimate topic and one worth expanding. Deletion achieves nothing. Worst case, merge. [[User:Pratyeka|prat]] ([[User talk:Pratyeka|talk]]) 09:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', two self-published sources, one blog, one unclear conference. {{ping|Pryateka}} it's not only allowed to improve deletion candidates, but just saying that it could be done doesn't help. –[[User:Be..anyone|Be..anyone]] ([[User talk:Be..anyone|talk]]) 18:51, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
| |||