Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cl4 (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:43, 8 April 2015

Revision as of 12:31, 8 April 2015

Line 13:

*'''Delete'''. I couldn't find anything about this in Google scholar, and it has no sources that would suggest any other kind of notability. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 00:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

*'''Comment''': Based on what little is known, Cl4 appears to have been designed in particular with embedded systems and Client/Server applications in mind. I thought I had a few promising leads on finding some more info, but they've all petered out. :-( [[User:Ceannlann gorm|Ceannlann gorm]] ([[User talk:Ceannlann gorm|talk]]) 17:27, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

*'''Keep''': At the very least I would suggest that it falls under [[WP:NOEFFORT]].{{<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ceannlann gorm|Ceannlann gorm]] ([[User talk:Ceannlann gorm|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ceannlann gorm|contribs]]) 11:09, April 8, 2015 (UTC)}}</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

*'''Delete''' A programming language that the article claims was "used widely in Australia, and some of the Asia Pacific region" should have a fair number of people trained in its usage as well as things such as reference books, journal mentions, and probably even a couple of websites supporting its user community. I have repeated the web searches mentioned above and received the same results. The lack of sources where they should be found clearly shows lack of notability and also suggests that this article may be a [[WP:HOAX|hoax]]. --''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]''&nbsp;^{[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]} 11:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)