Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
comment
Relisting debate
Line 4:
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimrod (programming language)}}</ul></div>
 
:{{la|Nim (programming language)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 312#{{anchorencode:Nim (programming language)}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nim_(programming_language) Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|programming language|(Nim OR Nimrod)}})
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by [[WP:GNG]]. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Nimrod+%28programming+language%29&year=&month=-1&tagfilter= deletion log for this article] shows that it has deleted twice at AfD in 2010 and 2013 and recreated and speedy deleted twice in 2013 and 2014 under the previous title, [[Nimrod (programming language)]]. This version was declined as [[Draft:Nim (programming language)]] in 2014. Speedy deletion was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nim_(programming_language)&diff=prev&oldid=653537277 declined this time] based on new sources not present previously. I'm not sure which sources are new since I don't have access to the old version and it was never snapshotted at archive.org but all of the sources currently offered are [[WP:PRIMARY]], [[WP:UNRELIABLE]] blogs or otherwise unsuitable. The only reliable source offered, a [http://www.drdobbs.com/jvm/the-rise-and-fall-of-languages-in-2013/240165192 Dr. Dobbs article], only makes a trivial mention of the subject. Google searches for Nim and Nimrod turned up nothing helpful. Recommending [[WP:SALT]]. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 01:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Line 165:
*:Apparently not '''too''' bad if the closing admin considers history merges as challenge: Before 2015-02-17 the relevant history is in the old article (=draft), then that was copied wholesale to the new page as shown in your diff replacing the new stub, and the relevant editing continued on the new page. &ndash;[[User:Be..anyone|Be..anyone]] ([[User talk:Be..anyone|talk]]) 23:53, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
*::There is a slight overlap between the copy-and-paste move, so a history merge wouldn't be appropriate (that would leave Gregh3285's earliest revisions to the current article with nowhere to go). See [[WP:PV]] for the general principle. — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr.&nbsp;Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius|♪&nbsp;talk&nbsp;♪]]</sup> 02:27, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Nakon|<font color="#C50">'''Nakon'''</font>]] 03:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Nim (programming language)]]</div>