Content deleted Content added
Tim Pierce (talk | contribs) →Link inclusion: deleted pages can be undeleted; external pages that vanish cannot |
|||
Line 88:
::{{ping|LongTermWikiUser}} I see you just re-added the links. Considering that consensus is stacked very much against you here, this is just becoming [[WP:DE|Disruptive editing]]. Can I suggest you drop the issue and move on, before you end up blocked? Thanks, [[User:Mdann52|Mdann52]] ([[User talk:Mdann52|talk]]) 16:48, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
::{{u|LongTermWikiUser}} but external links are subject to exactly the same kind of [[link rot]] and disappear without warning. The difference is that deleted pages on Wikipedia can always be undeleted if there's a need to restore the material. That's what makes your approach seem so odd to me. [[User:Tim Pierce|—Tim Pierce]] ([[User talk:Tim Pierce|talk]]) 16:54, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
:::{{u|Tim Pierce}} Wikipedia deleted nine links, no external links were deleted. The link rot logic fails miserably. Which is more stable? Nine deleted internal Wikipedia links or zero external links? [[User:LongTermWikiUser|LongTermWikiUser]] ([[User talk:LongTermWikiUser|talk]]) 18:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
== Moderated Discussion at [[WP:DRN|Dispute Resolution Noticeboard]] ==
| |||