Revision as of 19:48, 6 August 2011 edit Hamsterlopithecus (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,875 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:52, 24 April 2015 edit undo Wikidness69 (talk \| contribs) 14 edits →'extremely tedious' simply not true: new section Next edit →
Line 4: The title of this article seems misleading, since the term ''integration using complex analysis'' would usually be construed as meaning things like the [[residue calculus]]. [[User:Michael Hardy\|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy\|talk]]) 15:15, 30 August 2008 (UTC) :What do you think about the title "[[Complexifying the integral]]"? This is the terminology used by Prof. Mattuck of MIT [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpM1jJ0lob8] [[User:Hamsterlopithecus\|Hamsterlopithecus]] ([[User talk:Hamsterlopithecus\|talk]]) 19:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC) == 'extremely tedious' simply not true == It is just as straightforward to solve the 2nd integral using trig identities, no more than 3 lines of working using a total of 2 trig identities. 'extremely tedious' is in fact, extremely misleading

Talk:Integration using Euler's formula: Difference between revisions