Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generalized quaternion interpolation: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 15:
:::The "naive" way to look at the problem is to use some weighted average of the measurements (it is already not that easy if measurements have inconsistent error bars). But the thing is, that average is not easy to define, for instance the average of a set of unit vectors is not a unit vector, so you cannot find a straightforward geometrical definition for "average" here, because there are additional constraints on our objects (they must fit on a sphere). The article then proceeds to describe an algorithm that supposedly finds a good solution to the problem for a reason I do not quite see.
:Even if the article was rewritten into a clear, concise and correct summary of that reference, I am still not seeing how this could possibly be considered notable. [[User:Tigraan|Tigraan]] ([[User talk:Tigraan|talk]]) 15:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''—I think [[User:Tigraan|Tigraan]]'s analysis is more than generous. I'm not finding any [[WP
| |||