Content deleted Content added
explained {cite_book} example which had too much detail |
m Repair duplicate template arguments |
||
Line 28:
*<code><nowiki>{{cite news |author=Ann Scott Tyson |page=B01 |date=28 January 2011 |title=Metro system names leaders |work=The Washington Post |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/27/AR2011012707495.html |accessdate=5 February 2011 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/27/AR2011012707495_pf.html}}
</nowiki></code>
:{{cite news |author=Ann Scott Tyson |page=B01 |date=28 January 2011 |title=Metro system names leaders |work=The Washington Post <!--|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/27/AR2011012707495.html--> |accessdate=5 February 2011 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/27/AR2011012707495_pf.html}}
----
In {{tl|cite journal}}, if 'url' is not defined and 'pmid' is then the title is linked using 'pmid'. Here 'pmid' is set without 'url' and 'title' includes a wikilink so the wikilink markup is exposed. 'coauthors' is used, and no COinS metadata is created for this field. 'title' ends with a period which is passed to the COinS metadata. 'postscript' is set to a period, which is redundant. 'journal' includes a shortened title which is not understandable to many readers.
|