Revision as of 19:38, 22 July 2006 edit Craig Stuntz (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,533 edits we're discussing suitability for Wikipedia, not the merit of the methodology ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:03, 27 July 2006 edit undo Mailer diablo (talk \| contribs) Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators 55,628 edits Relisting debate Next edit →
Line 31: : In closing I should add that I do welcome your contributions on established, verifiable methodologies such as relational databases, so please don't take this AfD personally. This is not a discussion of the '''merit''' of what you term "collection oriented programming," only its '''suitability''' for Wikipedia. --[[User:Craig Stuntz\|Craig Stuntz]] 19:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC) :''''' <font color="#CC6600">AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.</font>'''''<br><small> Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mailer diablo\|Mailer Diablo]] 22:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:relist -->

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collection Oriented Programming: Difference between revisions