Revision as of 15:28, 10 June 2015 edit MrOllie (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 255,822 edits new comment at the end ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:45, 10 June 2015 edit undo MrOllie (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 255,822 edits →DbVisualizer: reply Next edit →
Line 12: Please note that while the company behind DbVisualizer is a commercial enterprise, the software is also available in a free version.[[User:ChristerW\|ChristerW]] ([[User talk:ChristerW\|talk]]) 15:11, 10 June 2015 (UTC) :I see that you added a number of external links to various reviews by various self published bloggers. These don't help build a case for notability unless they are published by [[WP:RS\|reliable sources]]. To quote [[WP:NSOFTWARE]]: ' the mere existence of reviews does not mean the software is notable'. Your argument about google hits is commonly brought up and well addressed [[Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions#Google_test\|by this essay.]]- [[User:MrOllie\|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie\|talk]]) 15:45, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DbVisualizer: Difference between revisions