Revision as of 12:02, 27 February 2014 edit ScotXW (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 14,442 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:44, 20 June 2015 edit undo 50.159.105.93 (talk) →Note #3 claims that Pascal was used to implement Windows: new section Next edit →
Line 127: The person that added the stuff about the NSA being able to 'access our computers' should really read: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/06/15/1216509/-The-MSFT-NSA-conspiracy-theory --[[Special:Contributions/212.121.112.33\|212.121.112.33]] ([[User talk:212.121.112.33\|talk]]) 14:02, 14 July 2013 (UTC) == Note #3 claims that Pascal was used to implement Windows == The Pascal calling convention was used because it saves on code size. That doesn't mean that the Pascal language was used. This fallacious claim should have a citation.

Talk:Windows API: Difference between revisions