Revision as of 03:47, 25 July 2015 edit Ceyockey (talk \| contribs) Administrators 83,474 edits weak keep ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:00, 25 July 2015 edit undo Lankiveil (talk \| contribs) 27,123 edits keep Next edit →
Line 16: '''Delete''' - although I can see citations to the research, what I cannot find is anything indicating that this algorithm is particularly significant or important. Mathematicians who are interested in linear algebra might find it interesting, but that does not mean it is notable, as defined by Wikipedia. '''''[[User:Phantomsteve\|<font color="#307D7E">Phantom</font><font color="#55CAFA">Steve</font>]]'''''/[[User talk:Phantomsteve\|<font color="#008000">talk</font>]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Phantomsteve\|<font color="#000080">contribs</font>]]\ 11:36, 24 July 2015 (UTC) '''Weak Keep''' - I've expanded the article a little bit with a couple of citations with an eye toward putting the article topic in context ... albeit I am a biologist/informatician and not a mathematician/astrophysicist. I am thinking this is one of a small number of algorithms used currently in periodic phenomenon detection in astronomy ... one application of such detection being identification of extra solar planets (though I added no citations related to this use). --User:Ceyockey (<small>''[[User talk:Ceyockey\|talk to me]]''</small>) 03:47, 25 July 2015 (UTC) *'''Keep''', seems to be discussed in the academic literature as identified above. Not understanding it or why it's important isn't itself a criterion for deletion. [[User:Lankiveil\|Lankiveil]] <sup>([[User talk:Lankiveil\|speak to me]])</sup> 06:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC).

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rybicki Press algorithm: Difference between revisions