Content deleted Content added
Jrounceville (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
New comments go on the bottom and replying. |
||
Line 6:
}}
{{WikiProject Computing|class=List|importance=low}}
== Sikuli / SikuliX ==▼
I'm trying to get Sikuli in the list. I tried to add an article so it wouldn't be rejected here, but I noticed lots of people are having trouble getting an article created due to Wiki's "notability" policy. Sikuli's a pretty significant tool to be missing from the list, notwithstanding all this pedantic procedural stuff. I've consulted at a number of Fortune 100 companies, and lots of them are using it. --[[User:Jrounceville|Jrounceville]] ([[User talk:Jrounceville|talk]]) 22:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)▼
==Junit==
Line 334 ⟶ 331:
::I think that you're quibbling. The articles for each tools listed here will also be proposed for deletion. Hardly any of them meet the criteria of notability or verifiability. By your criteria, a GUI tool must merely have an article, whether or not the article is a quality article. If that logic were allowed to continue, Wikipedia would contain both garbage articles and garbage indexes. I was not trying to create a link farm. I was trying to add another link. I now see that you're right. Wikipedia should be held to a higher standard. A list such as this is useless because it's not complete and the tools that it does list are here just because they have an article about them, whatever their level of notability. [[User:Victorianist|Victorianist]] ([[User talk:Victorianist|talk]]) 16:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
::: That's an interesting take. Let's let the AfD decide. [[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 16:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
▲== Sikuli / SikuliX ==
▲I'm trying to get Sikuli in the list. I tried to add an article so it wouldn't be rejected here, but I noticed lots of people are having trouble getting an article created due to Wiki's "notability" policy. Sikuli's a pretty significant tool to be missing from the list, notwithstanding all this pedantic procedural stuff. I've consulted at a number of Fortune 100 companies, and lots of them are using it. --[[User:Jrounceville|Jrounceville]] ([[User talk:Jrounceville|talk]]) 22:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
: It's been added as an article, three times, but deleted due to lack of notability. The most recent discussion, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikuli]], was July 2014. Based on what I'm seeing online, it still fails [[:WP:GNG]] or any of the [[:WP:N|notability]] guidelines. WHile Fortune 100 companies may be using it, it's not use that determines notability, but people writing about it. It's not that they're using it, but how as well. [[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 01:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
| |||