Content deleted Content added
New comments go on the bottom and replying. |
→Sikuli / SikuliX: doesn't seem notable |
||
Line 335:
I'm trying to get Sikuli in the list. I tried to add an article so it wouldn't be rejected here, but I noticed lots of people are having trouble getting an article created due to Wiki's "notability" policy. Sikuli's a pretty significant tool to be missing from the list, notwithstanding all this pedantic procedural stuff. I've consulted at a number of Fortune 100 companies, and lots of them are using it. --[[User:Jrounceville|Jrounceville]] ([[User talk:Jrounceville|talk]]) 22:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
: It's been added as an article, three times, but deleted due to lack of notability. The most recent discussion, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikuli]], was July 2014. Based on what I'm seeing online, it still fails [[:WP:GNG]] or any of the [[:WP:N|notability]] guidelines. WHile Fortune 100 companies may be using it, it's not use that determines notability, but people writing about it. It's not that they're using it, but how as well. [[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 01:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
: I just did a cursory examination and I'd also have a hard time saying that I can find enough for it to be notable. If you have some sources then please share them. [[User:AliveFreeHappy|AliveFreeHappy]] ([[User talk:AliveFreeHappy|talk]]) 19:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
| |||